Methodology
The formulas, thresholds and research behind Total Shareholder Yield, the 14 accounting red flags and the survivability score. Every input comes from audited SEC filings.
Understanding Total Shareholder Yield
Total Shareholder Yield captures the full picture of how a company returns value to its shareholders — not just dividends, but buybacks and balance sheet improvement too.
TSY = Dividend Yield + Net Buyback Yield + Debt Reduction Yield
All components expressed as a percentage of market capitalization
Dividend Yield
Total Dividends Paid / Market Cap
Direct cash payments to shareholders. The platform searches across 13 GAAP reporting tags to ensure no dividend-equivalent payment is missed, whether the company is a traditional corporation, a Master Limited Partnership (MLP), or a partnership structure that reports distributions rather than dividends.
Net Buyback Yield
(Gross Buybacks − Stock-Comp Dilution) / Market Cap
Measures the net effect of share repurchases minus dilution from stock-based compensation. Gross Buyback Yield captures raw repurchase spending, while Dilution Yield captures the offsetting share issuance. Buyback Effectiveness (Net / Gross) reveals what percentage of repurchase spending actually reduces share count rather than simply offsetting employee stock compensation. This component can be negative if dilution exceeds buybacks.
Debt Reduction Yield
Net Debt Decrease / Market Cap
Captures balance sheet strengthening. When a company pays down debt or builds cash reserves, that value accrues to equity holders. The calculation adjusts for changes in both debt and cash positions: (Beginning Debt − Ending Debt) adjusted for (Beginning Cash − Ending Cash). This component is floored at zero — debt increases do not produce a negative yield.
Reading the result
A high positive TSY means the company is returning significant value to shareholders through a combination of dividends, share count reduction, and debt paydown. A negative TSY means dilution from stock-based compensation and/or rising debt are eroding shareholder value faster than dividends and buybacks can compensate.
The strongest candidates — the company is returning cash while also investing in its future.
Potential value traps — the company is returning cash but may not be investing enough to sustain its business long-term.
The research behind TSY
Total Shareholder Yield is not a new idea — it is a well-documented factor with decades of academic and practitioner research supporting its predictive power.
Academic foundation
Dimson, Marsh, and Staunton found that high-yield stocks outperformed in 20 of 21 markets across 21 countries from 1900 to 2010, delivering an average 4.4% annual premium. Post-1982, when SEC Rule 10b-18 legitimized open-market buybacks, repurchases exceeded dividends in most years. Payout ratios declined from 70% pre-1946 to under 50% by the 2000s, yet total shareholder yield remained stable at 4-5% of market capitalization — the payout just shifted form.
TSY stability: the signal that matters
Original research using S&P 500 data from 2015-2024 revealed that TSY stability — the consistency of shareholder yield across time horizons — is a stronger predictor of future returns than TSY level alone. When stocks were sorted into quintiles by TSY consistency, the results showed perfect monotonicity: every step up in consistency corresponded to higher returns.
11.16% CAGR, 0.483 Sharpe ratio, -28.33% max drawdown
13.39% CAGR, 0.766 Sharpe ratio, -21.79% max drawdown
The gap: a 2.22% annual return advantage and 59% better risk-adjusted performance for the most consistent group. Among the top 20% of TSY stocks, splitting stable vs. unstable halves showed the stable group returned 13.03% annually versus 10.59% for the unstable group. During the 2022 bear market, the stable group lost only 3.3% while the unstable group lost 9.6%.
The 14 accounting red flags
The platform scans every company across 14 categories of accounting risk, analyzing over 100 data points from SEC XBRL filings to generate a risk score for each category.
Each category is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 10 (maximum risk). The overall accounting risk score is the average of all 14 category scores, providing a single composite measure of accounting quality.
Detects hidden financial obligations not visible on the balance sheet. Examines operating lease commitments relative to total debt, Variable Interest Entity (VIE) and Special Purpose Entity (SPE) exposures, guarantees, and contingent consideration liabilities. Flagged when the lease-to-debt ratio exceeds 30%, indicating the company may have substantially more obligations than reported debt suggests.
Identifies companies carrying overstated acquisition values. Measures goodwill as a percentage of total assets and tracks recent impairment charges. Companies that grow through acquisitions can accumulate goodwill far exceeding the real value of what they purchased. Flagged when goodwill exceeds 15% of total assets.
Analyzes pension funding status and the assumptions companies use to minimize reported pension costs. Examines Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) versus plan assets, funded status percentage, and expected return assumptions. Companies can mask pension underfunding through aggressive return assumptions. Flagged when funded status drops below 80%, return assumptions exceed 7%, or PBO exceeds 30% of total assets.
Detects signs that a company may be booking revenue prematurely or aggressively. Tracks Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) trends and the ratio of contract assets to contract liabilities. Rising DSO means the company is recognizing revenue faster than it collects cash, a classic early warning of earnings manipulation. Flagged when DSO exceeds 90 days or contract assets exceed twice contract liabilities.
Monitors whether the company is creating tax assets it may never realize. Examines deferred tax asset growth, valuation allowances, and uncertain tax positions. A rising valuation allowance signals that management itself doubts the recoverability of these assets. Flagged when the valuation allowance exceeds 25% of deferred tax assets.
Evaluates total lease exposure now that accounting standards require leases on the balance sheet. Analyzes operating versus finance lease liabilities, right-of-use assets, and total lease obligations relative to company size. Reveals hidden leverage that may not be immediately apparent from traditional debt metrics alone.
Examines the reliability of asset valuations on the balance sheet using the fair value hierarchy: Level 1 (market-quoted prices), Level 2 (observable inputs), and Level 3 (unobservable, management-estimated inputs). Level 3 assets are essentially marked-to-model, giving management discretion over valuations. Flagged when Level 3 assets exceed 10% of total fair value assets or unrealized gains exceed 50% of net income.
Tracks deterioration in operational efficiency through inventory turnover, receivables turnover, Days Payable Outstanding (DPO), and the Cash Conversion Cycle (DSO + Days Inventory Outstanding - DPO). A widening cash conversion cycle often precedes earnings disappointments and can indicate management is stretching payment terms or struggling to convert sales into cash.
Measures the gap between official GAAP earnings and the company's self-reported "adjusted" numbers. Companies routinely exclude stock-based compensation, restructuring charges, and acquisition costs to present rosier earnings. While some adjustments are legitimate, a persistent large gap may indicate the company is downplaying real costs. Flagged when non-GAAP adjustments exceed 30% of GAAP income.
Identifies transactions with insiders, affiliates, or entities connected to management. Tracks related party revenues, expenses, receivables, and payables as a percentage of total revenue. These transactions may not be conducted at arm's length and can obscure true operating performance. Flagged when related party activity exceeds 5% of revenue.
Monitors potential legal and environmental obligations that could materially impact the company. Examines litigation contingencies including loss accruals, settlements, and damages sought, environmental obligations such as remediation costs and asset retirement obligations, and warranty provisions across standard, extended, current, and noncurrent categories. Flagged when total contingent liabilities exceed 5% of total assets.
Assesses exposure from financial derivatives and hedging programs. Tracks derivative assets, liabilities, notional amounts, and hedge ineffectiveness charges. Large notional amounts can indicate significant risk exposure that is not transparent from the balance sheet alone. Flagged when notional value exceeds 50% of assets or net derivative positions exceed 10% of assets.
Evaluates whether acquisitions are creating or destroying shareholder value. Examines total acquisition cost, earnout and contingent consideration liabilities, integration costs, and the proportion of purchase price allocated to goodwill versus tangible assets. Flagged when acquisition spending exceeds 10% of total assets or when goodwill exceeds 80% of total acquisition cost.
Detects when companies capitalize costs that should be expensed, which artificially inflates both earnings and assets simultaneously. Examines capitalized software costs, the CapEx-to-depreciation ratio, and capitalized costs as a percentage of total assets. When CapEx significantly exceeds depreciation, it may indicate aggressive capitalization rather than genuine asset investment. Flagged when CapEx-to-depreciation exceeds 2x or capitalized software exceeds 5% of total assets.
Predictive power hierarchy
Not all red flags carry equal predictive weight. Research indicates the following hierarchy:
- Working Capital Deterioration
- Revenue Recognition / DSO Divergence
- Non-GAAP Metric Abuse
- Goodwill and Intangibles
- Aggressive Capitalization
- Deferred Tax Asset Growth
- Pension Underfunding (well-disclosed)
- Lease Obligations (post-ASC 842)
- Level 3 Fair Value (sector-concentrated)
Longevity & survivability analysis
Beyond current-period metrics, the platform evaluates long-term company durability across 10 dimensions, producing a composite survivability score and a 6-axis radar chart.
10 Survivability Dimensions
Each dimension is scored from 0 to 10. The composite survivability score is the average of all non-zero component scores, scaled to a 0-100 range.
Altman Z-Score
The Altman Z-Score is a formula developed by Edward Altman in 1968 that predicts the probability of corporate bankruptcy within two years. It combines five financial ratios — working capital/assets, retained earnings/assets, EBIT/assets, market value of equity/liabilities, and sales/assets — into a single discriminant score.
Free for everyone
Real data from XBRL tags, not third-party estimates. Institutional-grade tools, free for everyone.
